Topic summary
72% 4 analyzed articles/videos 5,416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Policy results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 2,992 hits . Analysis detected 26,814 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,804 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 35% (10,098 of 15,447 topics). This Science Policy is better (less manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group. Science Policy
Topic details
Total words: 21,804
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles21.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.7% 13.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst