Topic summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science History results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 46.5% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 111 faulty-reasoning hits from 228 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (143 of 16,243 topics). This Science History is worse (more manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group.
Science History
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 228
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

99% percentile
025507510099.1% percentile
24.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles228 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 46.5%46.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 46.5%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos