Topic summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video880 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Fiction Television results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.9% saturation with 1,105 hits. Analysis detected 3,295 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,202 of 16,562 topics). This Science Fiction Television is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Science Fiction Television
Topic details
Total words: 2,640
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510062.6% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 41.9%41.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.8%16.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 41.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%No True Scotsman: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos