Topic summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video1,094 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Fiction Films results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.1% saturation with 1,085 hits. Analysis detected 3,608 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,282 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (7,992 of 16,562 topics). This Science Fiction Films is worse (more manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
Science Fiction Films
Topic details
Total words: 3,282
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.7% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 33.1%33.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 33.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos