Topic summary
⁠24%2 analyzed articles/videos1,222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These School Nutrition Programs results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 434 hits. Analysis detected 2,753 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,888 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (16,186 of 23,468 topics). This School Nutrition Programs is better (less manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group.
School Nutrition Programs
Topic details
Total words: 4,888
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos