Topic summary
85% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,191 analyzed words
BS Summary: These School Meals results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 1,031 hits . Analysis detected 4,503 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,165 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (9,961 of 15,757 topics). This School Meals is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group. School Meals
Topic details
Total words: 6,165
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.7% 16.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst