Topic summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video2,327 analyzed words
BS Summary: These School Enrollment results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 619 hits. Analysis detected 5,440 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,981 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (11,026 of 16,562 topics). This School Enrollment is better (less manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
School Enrollment
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠34%School Enrollment (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 6,981
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.4% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.5%7.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos