Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These School District Management results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Status Quo Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 400 hits. Analysis detected 1,643 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,250 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,614 of 16,562 topics). This School District Management is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
School District Management
Topic details
Total words: 2,250
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 2.6%2.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos