Topic summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video829 analyzed words
BS Summary: These School District Consolidation results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Indoctrination, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 337 hits. Analysis detected 2,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,487 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,549 of 16,562 topics). This School District Consolidation is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
School District Consolidation
Topic details
Total words: 2,487
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.4% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.7%8.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.6%13.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos