Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Savings And Personal Finance results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 79.9% saturation with 1,059 hits. Analysis detected 4,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,326 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (314 of 16,562 topics). This Savings And Personal Finance is worse (more manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group.
Savings And Personal Finance
Topic details
Total words: 1,326
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

98% percentile
025507510098.1% percentile
17.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 79.9%79.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 75.6%75.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 50.1%50.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 24.4%24.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 30.3%30.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 12.8%12.8%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.8%19.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Topic 79.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 75.6%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 50.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 30.3%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 4.0%Personal Incredulity: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos