Topic summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video459 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Saved Bell Ed Alonzo Britney Spears results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Recency Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 205 hits. Analysis detected 1,215 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,377 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,330 of 15,792 topics). This Saved Bell Ed Alonzo Britney Spears is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group.
Saved Bell Ed Alonzo Britney Spears
Topic details
Total words: 1,377
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.9% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.9%14.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 11.4%11.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.2%13.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos