Topic summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos1,281 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sanctions Policy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 1,805 hits. Analysis detected 9,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,647 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,367 of 16,562 topics). This Sanctions Policy is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Sanctions Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,647
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 23.6%23.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos