Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sanctions Evasion results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 964 hits. Analysis detected 6,934 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,408 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (11,822 of 15,765 topics). This Sanctions Evasion is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Sanctions Evasion
Topic details
Total words: 8,408
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.5%11.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos