Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,978 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco Unified School District results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 1,528 hits. Analysis detected 7,798 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,033 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,983 of 16,562 topics). This San Francisco Unified School District is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
San Francisco Unified School District
Topic details
Total words: 7,033
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.7%21.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos