Topic summary
⁠87%3 analyzed articles/videos3,108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco 49ers results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 1,496 hits. Analysis detected 12,536 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,141 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,113 of 16,562 topics). This San Francisco 49ers is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
San Francisco 49ers
Topic details
Total words: 10,141
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.2%13.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.8%14.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos