Topic summary
⁠84%2 analyzed articles/videos2,434 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 1,486 hits. Analysis detected 6,783 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,302 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,703 of 16,562 topics). This Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 is better (less manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Topic details
Total words: 7,302
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.4%20.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos