Topic summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video798 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samsung Galaxy Unpacked results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 349 hits. Analysis detected 4,197 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,394 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,004 of 16,562 topics). This Samsung Galaxy Unpacked is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Samsung Galaxy Unpacked
Topic details
Total words: 2,394
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.8% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.6%14.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.0%8.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.6%6.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.8%10.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.2%11.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.1%7.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos