Topic summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video654 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Neill Death Fans Send Sales Wine Soaring results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 281 hits. Analysis detected 1,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,962 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,090 of 15,883 topics). This Sam Neill Death Fans Send Sales Wine Soaring is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Sam Neill Death Fans Send Sales Wine Soaring
Topic details
Total words: 1,962
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.7% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.3%14.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.2%7.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.1%6.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos