Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,067 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Darnold results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.8% saturation with 1,081 hits. Analysis detected 6,164 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,201 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,316 of 16,562 topics). This Sam Darnold is worse (more manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Sam Darnold
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,201
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510086.0% percentile
7.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.6%17.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 13.4%13.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 29.1%29.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 9.8%9.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 10.7%10.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 33.8%33.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 33.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 29.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos