Topic summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video1,603 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Salmonella Outbreak results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 574 hits. Analysis detected 3,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,809 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,425 of 16,559 topics). This Salmonella Outbreak is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Salmonella Outbreak
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠37%Salmonella Outbreak (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,809
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.9%11.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos