Topic summary
51% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,044 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sales Tax results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 1,030 hits . Analysis detected 7,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,568 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (9,458 of 15,448 topics). This Sales Tax is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group. Sales Tax
Topic details
Total words: 8,568
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst