Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video318 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Salem results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Anchoring Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 2.8% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 113 faulty-reasoning hits from 954 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (18,688 of 22,813 topics). This Salem is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group.
Salem
Topic details
Total words: 954
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510018.1% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles954 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 0.1%0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos