Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Salary Cap results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,443 hits. Analysis detected 13,361 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,726 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,701 topics). This Salary Cap is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Salary Cap
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,726
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos