Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,374 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Safety Net results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 884 hits. Analysis detected 5,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,109 of 16,562 topics). This Safety Net is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Safety Net
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,496
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.1%16.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.4%13.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos