Topic summary
⁠38%3 analyzed articles/videos2,054 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Safety Concerns results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,365 hits. Analysis detected 9,684 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,677 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,600 of 16,562 topics). This Safety Concerns is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Safety Concerns
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,677
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos