Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sacramento Kings results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 755 hits . Analysis detected 2,101 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,672 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Sacramento Kings is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Sacramento Kings
Topic details
Total words: 2,672
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 28.3% 28.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst