Topic summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video1,632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sabotage Theories results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 1,129 hits. Analysis detected 5,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (10,059 of 16,562 topics). This Sabotage Theories is better (less manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Sabotage Theories
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠40%Sabotage Theories (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 6,528
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.3%17.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos