Author summary
37% 1 analyzed article/video 1,632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zita Ballinger Fletcher results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 1,129 hits . Analysis detected 5,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,364 of 6,364 authors). This Zita Ballinger Fletcher is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group. Zita Ballinger Fletcher
Author details
Total words: 6,528
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.1% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.3% 11.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst