Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Russian Politics results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 689 hits. Analysis detected 2,116 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,540 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Russian Politics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Russian Politics
Topic details
Total words: 3,540
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.5%19.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos