Topic summary
54%1 analyzed article/video730 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russian Navy results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 304 hits. Analysis detected 1,807 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,190 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (6,044 of 16,562 topics). This Russian Navy is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Russian Navy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,190
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.5% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.6%6.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 13.9%13.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Tu Quoque: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos