Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Russian Foreign Policy results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 3,152 hits. Analysis detected 21,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,891 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This Russian Foreign Policy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Russian Foreign Policy
Topic details
Total words: 13,891
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.7%22.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 16.7%16.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.8%14.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos