Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rushing Yards results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 331 hits . Analysis detected 2,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (3,281 of 16,562 topics). This Rushing Yards is worse (more manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group. Rushing Yards
Topic details
Total words: 2,016
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.2% percentile 5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.4% 16.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.2% 13.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 7.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Special Pleading: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst