Topic summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video439 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rural Vs Urban results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Negativity Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 199 hits. Analysis detected 973 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,317 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,169 of 16,562 topics). This Rural Vs Urban is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
Rural Vs Urban
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,317
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510062.8% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.1%15.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos