Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video69 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rural Medicine results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 60.4% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 784 faulty-reasoning hits from 207 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (234 of 16,562 topics). This Rural Medicine is worse (more manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group.
Rural Medicine
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 207
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

99% percentile
025507510098.6% percentile
19.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles207 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 60.4%60.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 37.2%37.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 32.9%32.9%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 16.4%16.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 17.4%17.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 42.0%42.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 16.4%16.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.4%16.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.4%18.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 60.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 42.0%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Topic 37.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 32.9%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 8.1%Bandwagon: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 6.0%Special Pleading: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 3.1%Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos