Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ruby Rose results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 197 hits. Analysis detected 1,344 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 56% (7,400 of 16,562 topics). This Ruby Rose is worse (more manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Ruby Rose
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,976
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.3% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Red Herring: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos