Topic summary
⁠0%6 analyzed articles/videos7,102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Route 66 results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 2,438 hits. Analysis detected 22,006 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,468 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,399 of 16,562 topics). This Route 66 is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Route 66
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.1% percentile
2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles25.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos