Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Schnelle results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 155 hits . Analysis detected 760 faulty-reasoning hits from 980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 86% (918 of 6,365 authors). This Rachel Schnelle is worse (more manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Rachel Schnelle
Author details
Total words: 980
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.6% percentile 5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles980 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 13.7% 13.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 15.8% 15.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 13.7%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst