Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos418 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rotisserie Chicken results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 521 hits. Analysis detected 2,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,161 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,395 of 16,562 topics). This Rotisserie Chicken is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Rotisserie Chicken
Topic details
Total words: 5,161
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos