Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 420 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roman Catholic results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Status Quo Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 224 hits . Analysis detected 1,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 89% (1,919 of 16,562 topics). This Roman Catholic is worse (more manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group. Roman Catholic
Topic details
Total words: 1,260
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.4% percentile 7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 15.6% 15.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.0% 17.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 17.8% 17.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.9% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst