Topic summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 590 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roller Coasters results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 463 hits . Analysis detected 1,884 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,770 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 77% (3,938 of 16,562 topics). This Roller Coasters is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Roller Coasters
Topic details
Total words: 1,770
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.2% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 26.2% 26.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Topic 26.2%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst