Topic summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robotics In Schools results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 229 hits. Analysis detected 1,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,041 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,597 of 16,562 topics). This Robotics In Schools is worse (more manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Robotics In Schools
Topic details
Total words: 1,041
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510078.3% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.2%21.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 22.0%22.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 12.7%12.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.0%7.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 8.7%8.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos