Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Robot Vacuums results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 955 hits . Analysis detected 4,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,322 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Robot Vacuums is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Robot Vacuums
Topic details
Total words: 6,322
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 15.1% 15.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst