Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video830 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert J Nash results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 414 hits. Analysis detected 2,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (13,959 of 16,562 topics). This Robert J Nash is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group.
Robert J Nash
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠16%Robert J Nash (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,320
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510015.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.5%12.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos