Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Irwin results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 301 hits. Analysis detected 2,953 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,509 of 16,562 topics). This Robert Irwin is worse (more manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group.
Robert Irwin
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,512
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.9% percentile
6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 19.3%19.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 14.6%14.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.3%18.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.0%14.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.1%15.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.2%Straw Man: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos