Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos796 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Duvall results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 41.2% saturation with 983 hits. Analysis detected 3,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,388 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,839 of 16,562 topics). This Robert Duvall is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Robert Duvall
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,388
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.9% percentile
6.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 41.2%41.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 19.3%19.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Topic 41.2%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos