Topic summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Road Trip Fiction results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 734 hits . Analysis detected 3,821 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,478 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ā 75% (4,214 of 16,562 topics). This Road Trip Fiction is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group. Road Trip Fiction
Topic details
Total words: 2,478
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.6% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 29.6% 29.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Blind-Spot Bias Sitewide 0.2% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 29.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.6% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst