Author summary
ā 0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,649 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heller McAlpin results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 1,290 hits . Analysis detected 7,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,947 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ā 79% (1,401 of 6,502 authors). This Heller McAlpin is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Heller McAlpin
Author details
Total words: 4,947
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.5% percentile 4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 26.1% 26.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.9% 7.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.3% 11.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Blind-Spot Bias Sitewide 0.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 26.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.9%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst