Topic summary
⁠24%2 analyzed articles/videos790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ridesharing results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 199 hits. Analysis detected 1,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,517 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,293 of 16,245 topics). This Ridesharing is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Ridesharing
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,517
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.4%6.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos