Author summary
58% 1 analyzed article/video 643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Fitzgerald results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 160 hits . Analysis detected 1,182 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,929 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,671 of 6,321 authors). This Thomas Fitzgerald is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group. Thomas Fitzgerald
Author details
Total words: 1,929
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.8% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.5% 2.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst