Topic summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ride Sharing Regulations results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Slippery Slope, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,393 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,789 of 16,559 topics). This Ride Sharing Regulations is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group.
Ride Sharing Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 1,776
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.1% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.7%8.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.8%3.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos